I’ve noticed an
interesting phenomena when it comes to music…people seem to think that if they
happen to like one particular style better than another, it behooves them to
belittle the form that they don’t like. It can’t just be a matter of different
tastes; one has to be good and the other has to be not worthy of even being
considered.
I noticed this many years
ago when I was teaching a summer course on web design when Hanson was big.
Rather than creating a website about something they liked, the
adolescent boys I had worked very hard on an anti-Hanson page. Further back
than that, I remember working in Manhattan with someone who adored Springsteen,
but reviled Barry Manilow as being “ersatz.” And I have a dear friend who I
went to music school with, who hates country and bluegrass music because “her
mother didn’t pay all that money for her musical education for her to listen to
that crap.”
And into this already sad mix, I saw a link on Facebook a
few weeks ago for the group I’m Fed Up with Bad Church Music. I had already let out a long sigh when I saw the
name of the group, and then I got more disheartened when I read this partial
description of the group:
This group may be for you...
1. If you are of the opinion that Shine Jesus Shine, Here I
Am, Lord, etc. are not the most beautiful church songs ever written.
2. If you think the Mass of Creation has had its day.
3. You actually kind of
like the idea of singing chant and hymns. Gasp!
4. If you'd rather hear
a pipe organ in church than a band or keyboard.
Really? Is this really necessary? Can’t one say that they prefer
a certain type of hymnody and liturgical music without saying that everything
else is trash?
I got pretty much the
same musical education as my friend who looks down her nose at country and
bluegrass, and that education enabled me to appreciate the value of all
kinds of music…even if it wasn’t a style that I was particularly enamored of.
My first paying job was
as a boy soprano at a “high church” Episcopal church of the type that many
members of this group either belong to or wish that their church was like; and I can chant with the best of them. But
I was also lucky enough to experience all kinds of hymnody and liturgical music
as a result of not only being in the choirs of many churches, but of visiting
many churches with my friends.
What I learned from this
is that there’s a lot out there. There’s a lot of church music out there from all different subcultures and styles, and they all have their place.
That being said, there are many contemporary hymns and pieces of liturgical music that I could live without ever hearing again. But I can also say the same thing about many “traditional” or “classic” pieces of church music. Similarly, there are many pieces of both types of music that I absolutely love.
That being said, there are many contemporary hymns and pieces of liturgical music that I could live without ever hearing again. But I can also say the same thing about many “traditional” or “classic” pieces of church music. Similarly, there are many pieces of both types of music that I absolutely love.
I don’t make an idol of
any one particular style, and am capable of mixing them up. I also believe that
to think that God likes one type of church music better than another is the
height of arrogance. Can’t we accept the fact that we have a personal preference
for one particular type of church music without saying that all other types are
holy crap?
And yet, since we went there, I’ll be honest
with you…I’m no big fan of Shine, Jesus,
Shine either, but I love Here I Am,
Lord.
But...my all-time favorite hymn remains In Heavenly Love Abiding, from the venerated 1940 Episcopal Hymnal.
And that's OK.
Now...can we all just get along now?