Many years ago I read a letter to one of the two twin
sisters of advice…Abby and Ann…from a woman who was totally devastated after
the death of her husband of 50 or so years; a man who was well-respected in the
community and with whom she had an almost fairytale marriage. No, not because
of his death itself, which is to be expected, especially after that long of a
marriage. But because of what she found out in the weeks after the funeral.
You see, after her husband was dead, someone felt free to
tell her about the many affairs he had during those 50 years, and that he had
worked very hard to keep her from finding out about.
Now, before I go on, we will all pause to virtually smack
that person upside the head with a 2 x 4. Why? I mean really, just what did
this person hope to accomplish? What good did this person think would come from
this? Was getting this long-held secret off their chest worth the price of what
it would do to her? I’m guessing that you can figure out my answer.
When this woman wrote to the twins, one of the things she
said was that when she learned this, she realized that her whole life was a
sham, and that her husband never really loved her anyway.
Wait. Time out. Hold it. Stop. It’s logical fallacy time.
It’s also time for me to introduce you to a little cognitive dissonance.
In our culture, we make the mistake of confusing love and
fidelity, and maybe they’re not always the same thing. Maybe you can love
someone with all your heart, and not be able to be faithful to him or her, as
hard as you might try. I can see that some of you aren’t buying this, so let me
give you a different example.
Suppose someone said “If you really love me, then you’ll
learn how to play the piano?” And suppose you just happen to be tone deaf? You
could love that person with all your heart and soul, but not be able to play
Heart and Soul. Does your inability to play even the most rudimentary piece
of music, despite getting the rest of the relationship right, mean that you
don’t love that person? I know this is an imperfect example, but can you see my
point?
Conversely, in the song Silver
Threads and Golden Needles, the singer says that she doesn’t care about his
stupid mansion or all his money. She wants him to stop fooling around with
other women and love her again. Um…I hate to ruin her pretty little picture,
but his being faithful to her wouldn’t
necessarily mean that he loved her again, but simply that he was
following the rules because they were the rules.
Is it reasonable to ask, nay, demand, that the person who
claims that they love us be faithful? I’ll give you a definite “maybe” on that.
Perhaps it can be done most of the time. And perhaps we modern westerners are a
little to tough on ourselves. Look at the story of Jacob from Genesis. He was
counted as being faithful while having two wives and being able to get it from
the maidservants.
But let’s go back to the beginning. The letter-writer
claimed that all of this showed that her husband never really loved her anyway.
I beg to differ, and this is where the cognitive dissonance kicks in. I can see
him as really loving, really adoring, his wife, but knowing that no matter how
hard he tried, he could never be faithful. And I can see him working very hard
to make sure that she never found out, so that he could preserve the world she
knew…precisely because he loved her.
And then along comes some well-meaning dolt who feels that
they have to tell her the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment