Christmas is coming, the goose is getting fat, and the
complaints are gonna start about the commercialization of “our” religious
holiday. Complaints that have been going on for at least 100 years.
But what if things were different? I mean, there’s no real
reason why The Feast of the Nativity has to be held on December 25th.
There’s no historical evidence to show that that’s when Jesus was actually
born. In fact, little clues in the story about shepherds watching their flocks by
night seem to point to a different time of year.
So why do we celebrate Christmas when we do?
The short answer is because the Church tried to calm down an
already established, and pretty wild, pagan holiday season by putting a
religious holiday there.
That’s sort of like scheduling your wedding for the 4th
of July.
And instead of Christmas calming down the previous Yuletide,
it took on the aspects of the already existing 800-pound gorilla. That’s right,
Christmas isn’t the 800-pound holiday season gorilla, Yuletide is; and it
influences everything that comes across its path.
But what if things were different?
What if Christmas was celebrated at some other time?
What if we celebrated Christmas in June or July?
It would be a totally different holiday…I mean holy
day…wouldn’t it? It would have none of the trappings of the gift-giving
Yuletide celebration that would still be going on at the end of the year, and
that everyone would feel a little freer about celebrating, since it wasn’t tied
to any one religion. It would belong to “us” alone, and we wouldn’t have to
complain about it being commercialized and trivialized.
It would get about as much publicity outside the Church as
Pentecost. Actually…it would probably get about as much attention in
the church as Pentecost. We’d prepare for it for a week or two, observe it in
church that day, and then on Monday morning, it would be back to the same old grind. OK, so we might still be singing Christmas hymns for the
next two weeks…but only amongst ourselves.
Let me repeat that one: only amongst ourselves.
No one else outside the Church would know, or care about it.
There’d be no Charlie Brown Christmas
because it wouldn’t be a big cultural holiday anymore. I doubt that there’d be
a Charlie Brown Yule either, since
the premise of the original was the conflict between the religious and secular
holidays. In fact, there wouldn’t be any Christmas specials anymore,
because it would be an internal Church day. Yuletide specials, however, would
abound; and no one would complain about the commercialization of the Yuletide
season.
There also wouldn’t be six weeks of publicly singing and
hearing Christmas hymns along with the secular Yuletide stuff. Some
people, who aren’t Christians, might actually like not being bombarded
with stuff from a religion they don’t belong to for six weeks.
Although we might still have to put up with Last Winter I Gave You My Heart
for that long.
And this brings up something worth thinking about: Perhaps
if we had Christmas all to ourselves, we’d lose all opportunity to talk to
other people about our religion. We’d lose the opportunity to talk about the
annual Christmas pageant, what music our church is doing, what our family
Christmas traditions are…religious and secular.
Yes, as much as we may lament the apparent trivializing of
our holy day, having it placed where it is gives us an ability to talk about it
with others that keeping it to ourselves doesn’t.
So maybe the Church didn’t shoot itself in the foot when
they placed the Feast of the Nativity smack dab in the middle of the Yuletide
season all those years ago.
And maybe those of us in the church need to be a little
better at recognizing that there are two celebrations going on at the same
time, and not getting into a little snit when some of the 4th of
July creeps into our wedding.
Because some of our wedding also creeps into the 4th
of July.
No comments:
Post a Comment