Well, I've seen a lot of
comments come through my feed over the last few days about Hugh Hefner. Some
about how four generations of 13-year-old boys owe him a debt they can never
repay, some about how he contributed to the moral degradation of our country,
some about how he managed to die on Hump Day. I think the reality of Hugh
Hefner and the changes he brought to society are a little more nuanced and
complicated than a simple black and white “good vs evil” assessment.
Yes...he did help to
bring sex out into the open. He helped make us able to talk about it openly, to
admit that we enjoyed it. To admit that we (women as well as men)
wanted it. He helped us to be able to joke about it in “polite company.” And
yes, he gave many 13-year-old boys their first look at a naked girl who wasn’t
their sister, and was much better built. He helped us to get out of the era of sexual repression that we had been in for way too long.
And that’s a genie that needed to be
let out of the bottle.
Now...if you believe
in sexual repression, then you obviously think that he was the personification
of evil. But if you don’t believe in it, then things look a little
different.
Did he help glorify the
objectification of women? I don't know. Don’t we all objectify each
other? I’ve taught high school girls, I’ve read Redbook and Cosmo, and I’ll
tell you that there’s enough objectification going on by everyone on both
sides of the fence. It’s what humans do as sexual creatures.
The difference here is
that men tend to be a lot more visual than women. When a group of investors
tried to put out a women’s magazine with photos of naked men, they found
that women weren’t their biggest customers...but gay men were.
Seems that’s just the way
we’re wired.
And I’ll let you in on a
little secret...in my adolescent/young adult days, when I’d look at the
pictures in Playboy, my first
thoughts weren't “Nice tits, I’d like to f*** her”, although that was a close
second. My first thought was, “She seems really nice. I wonder if she’d like
me.”
You see...the genius of
Hefner and Playboy from my perspective at that age was that he presented the women there as people with personalities, people with
interests, people who you might want to get to know better...and then
maybe sleep with...because it seemed like you'd both enjoy it. (And let’s
hear it for my personal favorite from back in the day, Barbi Benton).
Those other magazines
weren’t as classy as Playboy. They
weren’t about getting to know…and maybe sleep with…the girl next door. They
were about body parts and kinkiness. Does anyone remember that Playboy was
first offered the infamous Vanessa Williams photos, and turned them down? He
was not in the business of ruining people’s reputations for a quick buck…and
especially not for the kind of pictures those were. Unfortunately, someone else
across town was. Ah...if only Hef had bought the photos when he had the opportunity, and just sat
on them...
But in the end, Hef was a
victim of his own publicity. As he got older, he couldn’t seem to let go of the
idea of himself as the stud able to surround himself with beautiful young women.
He didn’t get that while it might seem cool to be seen with a hot 24-year-old at
age 48, at age 84 most of us…most of us guys…were going “Eew…she could
be your grand-daughter!” He didn't understand the “Eew Equation” of half your age, plus 7. It’s as if, having let the genie out of the
bottle, he let it take him over. He couldn’t just quietly step back at age 69
and say, “You know, I’m really too old for this now.” He didn’t understand that there can be too much of a good thing, and became a caricature of
himself…a garish caricature of himself.
Hugh Hefner is dead. And
like so many of us, he was a mixed bag…who also gave us a mixed bag.
No comments:
Post a Comment